![]() ![]() When the casts were asked to read the narration, they surprisingly did it well compared to when they had to act it out in front of the camera. As I said, they were just spoken without being understood. ![]() ![]() Even the simple explanation about science, it sounded like a dreamy thought. Conversations that happened between Dimas and Rueben were much funnier, they seemingly talked about how they connect their made-up stories with scientific and philosophical theories, but I do not think they actually understand that. The flaw is on how little improvisation was done by the casts, they referred too much to the script and sounded like they were memorizing the dialogue. Dee, the writer of the original novel, is characterized by using deep, heavy, philosophical words, and somehow are too stiff to be said in a daily conversation. Some were essential, but could not support the plot because they were just spoken without being understood by the cast. ![]() The dialogues were mostly like an empty shell, they did not represent the things that has been going on in the film. Some scenes were intense and warm, ultimately the scenes between Ferre and Rana but some scenes were too awkward and stiff, especially Rana's crying scene and some of Diva's dialogues. Despite the looks and the popularity, the actors were almost failed to represent the depth of each character in the film. The Actors If I said about the actors, they are all good-looking exactly the type of actors that can draw the movie-goers nowadays. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |